Final Schedule/Time to Change Event to Invitation Only?

| | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

Organizer Message

I'm very pleased to say that the final schedule is now complete. It's been a lot of work. 85 of the confirmed sessions can be found below.

This may well be the last Emerging Communications Conference & Awards that is open to the public at large. The 2011 event may be by invitation only. If this is the case, we'll honor all past participants (including those who attend next week) by automatically granting invites to future events. However all other future people wishing to attend will need to receive an invitation (or apply and then be assessed according to criteria which would be set in due course).

The first conference back in 2008 attracted 280 people with no marketing and no sales team, relying on community word of mouth to propagate to those who would benefit. 2009 attracted 360 under similar circumstances. If ticket sales this week continue today and tomorrow at the same rate, next week may be larger still. I'd like to put a break on those numbers, to protect against further escalation at the 2011 event. I'd rather lock the numbers at 400 maximum and then spend research and effort selecting the audience instead over the coming years.

I think this direction had been coming for a while without me quite realizing it. This comment ("you are totally, and utterly underselling the first day....To be completely honest, this line up would sell itself. I'm not sure the casual reader of the schedule will pick this up") following the last update prompted me to start rethinking. To date I've ran it as a service, primarily intended for friends. I've ensured that I've not been paid a single dollar (by ensuring that any surplus is spent back out on attendees). Likewise with the event next week; which is why I've just authorized an extensive WiFi upgrade as well as free drinks on all three nights.

I've saw each event as a masterpiece, each with a theme. Although 90%+ of people report on feedback forms that it exceeded their expectations, I don't think a substantive amount are connecting all the available dots and understanding the "piece" as a unit. As such, there is more room for value to be created. I'd always assumed that people would apply their intellectual horsepower to back engineer, to extrapolate so as to make valuable connections and inferences. But it turns out that a significant proportion of people simply don't have the time and/or would much prefer some formal "pre-chewing" and post-event "chewing", delivered in a way for quick and actionable consumption.

For example I'm totally jazzed about mobile augmented reality (AR) since it came of age at the end of 2009. So much so, the last day is dedicated to it and now it's stretching to a 12-hour day! It's going to be amazing and will be the first such commercial gathering. But in conversation with friends privately recently, it was evident that nobody (except Martin Geddes) understood the very likely tight coupling between AR and "communications". Such a tight coupling offers immense opportunities for a substantial percentage of companies in the mobile/telecom/Internet communications space. Let me tickle you. AR has been about overlaying the "online space" (e.g. media/information) onto the "offline" world (AKA "real world"), i.e. providing visual metadata. But significant opportunities are up for grabs (in the greenfield sense) by applying to communication services.

AR could be used as the interface to interact with the "digital space", in our case, communications services. For example you could "see" AR created photo frames in your living room of people you cherish. If one of these people calls you, their photo frame could flash and it's general color state could indicate how long ago since the last call from that person (if it's too long the photo frame can vanish). If you wish to create a conference call, you could "pick up" two such photo frames and knock them together. You can keep building out from there, e.g. have texts (SMS) displayed as sticky notes on the photo frame. Already magazines are beginning to embrace AR and it's a logical step to add in communication services, e.g. advertisements have an AR component such as an AR overlaid Twitter feed. This is all entirely possible. It will generate significant value and it's just the beginning. The question is where would your company fit in such a value chain? Whom should you partner with?

In the same veign, it's worth noting that Michael Gervautz very recently became a Director of Business Development at Qualcomm, following Qualcomm's recent acquisition of Imagination Computer Services (he's speaking on Day 3). Google made its first ever UK acquisition recently, by acquiring Plink. The two founders will work on Google Goggles (the lead engineer of Google Goggles keynoting the start of day 3).

Now aside from people wanting more "human processing" type services in conjunction with the event, the value of events is going down. The number of events is mushrooming and it's creating more noise relative to signal. Many of these events seem to be seeking ever higher numbers in order to use the attendee count as the primary metric to sell to sponsors. You know when "real" value is being driven out when competitions are held to win material things, from hotel and flight coverage to a new car or "VIP" passes are thrown around free. I think the future of events is changing and both attendees and sponsors will migrate from such scattergun type events towards more niche, well-defined, focused events, particularly those that are best at fostering the most valuable conversations.

All in all, I see benefit by putting a brake on attendee numbers for 2011, and the start of ongoing audience curation, as well as the introduction of pre, during and post-event support materials Etc. At the other end of the spectrum I'd also like to see the creation of Emerging Communication "unconferences"; small scale, low-cost/low-entry fee type events around various cities, with a propensity towards developers, hackers and general all-round grassroots innovation.

No final decisions have not been made and I look forward to hearing feedback in the coming weeks, particularly because the event has always been community-driven.

I look forward to seeing many of you next week. If you have any questions etc. I'd contact me in the next few hours because I'll be going to spend sometime with my 3-year old in Austria before going over to London then over to San Francisco.

Regards,

Lee S Dryburgh (Founder)

PS Only 1 hour night tutorial slots are left. If you're interested in tendering to provide such a tutorial, email me directly at lee.dryburgh AT eComm.ec

PSS The mobile application award winners were recently announced, see 5:40pm-6pm on Day 2 here.


Confirmed Talks


Next Event

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Final Schedule/Time to Change Event to Invitation Only?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://ecomm.ec/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2493

ID = 2753; $post->blog_id = 9; $post->guid = "final_schedule_invitation_only"; $post->comment_status = "open"; function get_option($option) { $settings = array( "disqus_forum_url" => "ecommconf", "disqus_api_key" => "JPTlQ8TwrMbJcxH60mb8OTGGjAZ4ndS6gTKjBRZGtIM2FwYzqt4W9VqbDqWo2x6L", "disqus_sort" => "", "disqus_partner_key" => "", "disqus_disable_sync" => "0" ); return $settings[$option]; } function get_permalink() { return "http://blog.ecomm.ec/2010/04/final-schedule-invitation-only.html"; } function get_the_title() { return "Final Schedule/Time to Change Event to Invitation Only?"; } function get_the_excerpt() { return "

Organizer Message

\n

I'm very pleased to say that the final schedule is now complete. It's been a lot of work. 85 of the confirmed sessions can be found below.

\n

This may well be the last Emerging Communications Conference & Awards that is open to the public at large. The 2011 event may be by invitation only. If this is the case, we'll honor all past participants (including those who attend next week) by automatically granting invites to future events. However all other future people wishing to attend will need to receive an invitation (or apply and then be assessed according to criteria which would be set in due course).

\n

The first conference back in 2008 attracted 280 people with no marketing and no sales team, relying on community word of mouth to propagate to those who would benefit. 2009 attracted 360 under similar circumstances. If ticket sales this week continue today and tomorrow at the same rate, next week may be larger still. I'd like to put a break on those numbers, to protect against further escalation at the 2011 event. I'd rather lock the numbers at 400 maximum and then spend research and effort selecting the audience instead over the coming years.

\n

I think this direction had been coming for a while without me quite realizing it. This comment (\"you are totally, and utterly underselling the first day....To be completely honest, this line up would sell itself. I'm not sure the casual reader of the schedule will pick this up\") following the last update prompted me to start rethinking. To date I've ran it as a service, primarily intended for friends. I've ensured that I've not been paid a single dollar (by ensuring that any surplus is spent back out on attendees). Likewise with the event next week; which is why I've just authorized an extensive WiFi upgrade as well as free drinks on all three nights.

\n

I've saw each event as a masterpiece, each with a theme. Although 90%+ of people report on feedback forms that it exceeded their expectations, I don't think a substantive amount are connecting all the available dots and understanding the \"piece\" as a unit. As such, there is more room for value to be created. I'd always assumed that people would apply their intellectual horsepower to back engineer, to extrapolate so as to make valuable connections and inferences. But it turns out that a significant proportion of people simply don't have the time and/or would much prefer some formal \"pre-chewing\" and post-event \"chewing\", delivered in a way for quick and actionable consumption.

\n

For example I'm totally jazzed about mobile augmented reality (AR) since it came of age at the end of 2009. So much so, the last day is dedicated to it and now it's stretching to a 12-hour day! It's going to be amazing and will be the first such commercial gathering. But in conversation with friends privately recently, it was evident that nobody (except Martin Geddes) understood the very likely tight coupling between AR and \"communications\". Such a tight coupling offers immense opportunities for a substantial percentage of companies in the mobile/telecom/Internet communications space. Let me tickle you. AR has been about overlaying the \"online space\" (e.g. media/information) onto the \"offline\" world (AKA \"real world\"), i.e. providing visual metadata. But significant opportunities are up for grabs (in the greenfield sense) by applying to communication services.

\n

AR could be used as the interface to interact with the \"digital space\", in our case, communications services. For example you could \"see\" AR created photo frames in your living room of people you cherish. If one of these people calls you, their photo frame could flash and it's general color state could indicate how long ago since the last call from that person (if it's too long the photo frame can vanish). If you wish to create a conference call, you could \"pick up\" two such photo frames and knock them together. You can keep building out from there, e.g. have texts (SMS) displayed as sticky notes on the photo frame. Already magazines are beginning to embrace AR and it's a logical step to add in communication services, e.g. advertisements have an AR component such as an AR overlaid Twitter feed. This is all entirely possible. It will generate significant value and it's just the beginning. The question is where would your company fit in such a value chain? Whom should you partner with?

\n

In the same veign, it's worth noting that Michael Gervautz very recently became a Director of Business Development at Qualcomm, following Qualcomm's recent acquisition of Imagination Computer Services (he's speaking on Day 3). Google made its first ever UK acquisition recently, by acquiring Plink. The two founders will work on Google Goggles (the lead engineer of Google Goggles keynoting the start of day 3).

\n

Now aside from people wanting more \"human processing\" type services in conjunction with the event, the value of events is going down. The number of events is mushrooming and it's creating more noise relative to signal. Many of these events seem to be seeking ever higher numbers in order to use the attendee count as the primary metric to sell to sponsors. You know when \"real\" value is being driven out when competitions are held to win material things, from hotel and flight coverage to a new car or \"VIP\" passes are thrown around free. I think the future of events is changing and both attendees and sponsors will migrate from such scattergun type events towards more niche, well-defined, focused events, particularly those that are best at fostering the most valuable conversations.

\n

All in all, I see benefit by putting a brake on attendee numbers for 2011, and the start of ongoing audience curation, as well as the introduction of pre, during and post-event support materials Etc. At the other end of the spectrum I'd also like to see the creation of Emerging Communication \"unconferences\"; small scale, low-cost/low-entry fee type events around various cities, with a propensity towards developers, hackers and general all-round grassroots innovation.

\n

No final decisions have not been made and I look forward to hearing feedback in the coming weeks, particularly because the event has always been community-driven.

\n

I look forward to seeing many of you next week. If you have any questions etc. I'd contact me in the next few hours because I'll be going to spend sometime with my 3-year old in Austria before going over to London then over to San Francisco.

\n

Regards,
\n
\nLee S Dryburgh (Founder)

\n

PS Only 1 hour night tutorial slots are left. If you're interested in tendering to provide such a tutorial, email me directly at lee.dryburgh AT eComm.ec

\n

PSS The mobile application award winners were recently announced, see 5:40pm-6pm on Day 2 here.
\n


\n

Confirmed Talks

\n\n


Next Event

\n"; } function get_the_offset() { return -8; } function start_mt() { include('/home/ecommec/public_html/cgi-bin/mt/php/mt.php'); $mt = new MT(9, '/home/ecommec/public_html/cgi-bin/mt/mt-config.cgi'); return $mt; } function trackback_url() { return "http://ecomm.ec/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2493"; } include('/home/ecommec/public_html/cgi-bin/mt/plugins/disqus/php/disqus.php'); include(dsq_comments_template(1)); ?>

Get Updates

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lee S Dryburgh published on April 15, 2010 4:36 PM.

Europe 2009 Video: Finding Disruption (Michael Jackson) was the previous entry in this blog.

America 2010 Program Guide Now Available is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.